🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.